BIG BANG IS A HOAX

Let's discuss the subject of the Big Bang. This is not a detailed scientific discussion, just several essential points sticking out and not fitting with common wisdom published in scientific literature.

1) If there was a Big Bang, there must have been something before it; let's call that a pre-Big Bang. We don't know what it was, but there must have been something. Quantum energy fluctuations, OK, good enough for now. Where does that something come from? There is no legitimate answer. And fluctuations occur in time, but there is no time.

2) There are indications that something happened about 13.8 billion years ago. OK, let's stick with it. Why didn't it happen 23.8 billion years ago? Why didn't it stay in its pre-Big Bang state for another 50 billion years? There isn't any reason for it to occur at all. No magical threshold exists, so no threshold could have been reached. Yet, we are told it happened. Why? Out of boredom?

3) Time is supposed to start at the Big Bang. So pre-Big Bang existed in no time? How is this possible?

4) There was no space either since no time means no space. Because Einstein said so. True or false?

5) Some say the original Big Bang Universe was very small, which is false; this is the problem with Einstein's equations. Because they do not work with small objects.

6) The pre-Big Bang Universe was already quite extensive, then suddenly, for no particular reason, decided to blow up by orders of magnitude in size, basically, in no time. This part is phony!

7) Scientific data confirms that the Universe is expanding. However, nothing in the Big Bang and the resulting inflation part guarantees expansion or moving matter and energy away from the Big Bang. Why didn't the post-Big Bang Universe start to shrink? Or expand here, and shrink over there? The Big Bang is not a bomb; it is also not an implosion device. The expansion part and the Big Bang are not related. Who can explain this discrepancy?

8) Why is the Universe so big? It does not make any sense. So many galaxies, so many stars, so much gas, and other junk. What for?

9) Energy is a scalar quantity; the expansion requires momentum, which is a vector quantity. How do you go from a scalar to a vector? Some additional mechanisms are needed.

10) Four fundamental forces in the Universe just popped up. Again, out of nowhere. Then decided to work, clump things together, and form atoms and molecules. Where does an electron come from? Where does the electron or proton charge come from? Where do the spins come from? Where do all elementary particles come from? From quantum fluctuations of energy? Very unlikely. Something significant needs to be added here.

11) The Cosmic Microwave Background CMB data shows the early Universe temperature to be around 2.7K and extremely uniform. Very hot early Universe suddenly became very cold, and the violent, sudden expansion caused the temperature to be uniform everywhere? Come on, this is pure nonsense!

12) Is it possible that light in the early, very dense Universe behaved differently from today's light? The surroundings were very different. The constant speed of light comes from Einstein, and all the data available to him came from Earth's surroundings, and he assumed that it must be true everywhere. How can anyone conclude that? He reached that conclusion based on a lack of data, very sneaky indeed.

13) Many galaxies are likely to be even older than the Big Bang. Future space telescopes, even more sensitive than JWST, are likely to confirm that.

14) It's time to start thinking about how to make such a new and revolutionary telescope. It would have to be assembled by robots over a fairly long time somewhere far from the Sun. It would need a constant supply of materials required to operate it, namely helium and other gasses, isotope-powered batteries, and maybe solar cells. The robots would have to be able to fix damage caused by meteorites and gamma radiation, plus replace aging parts.

15) We must mention Roger Penrose's idea that the Universe, in some form, always existed, and it had no beginning but does have an end. This theory sidesteps most of the problems that we discussed, but the expansion issue, however, still remains.

For now, the Big Bang does not sound like a reliable scientific theory but rather a hoax. What is your opinion on this subject?